User talk:DarwIn

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DarwIn!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

File:IBPA 140099 - Orquestra infanto-juvenil do Morro da Cruz realiza concerto no - 2024-11-21 - Htz produções.jpg

File:IBPA 140099 - Orquestra infanto-juvenil do Morro da Cruz realiza concerto no - 2024-11-21 - Htz produções.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Suellen Rayanne (Trans de Direita).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Suellen Rayanne (Trans de Direita).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:IBPA 21069 - SMC apresenta a programação que irá integrar o Porto Verão Alegre - 2018-12-21 - SMC-PMPA.jpg

File:IBPA 21069 - SMC apresenta a programação que irá integrar o Porto Verão Alegre - 2018-12-21 - SMC-PMPA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 00:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural question, Brazilian FOP cases

Hello DarwIn,

we met again on a recently uploaded file out of a batch processed by you where I wrote a COM:FOP Brazil DR. I think that it wasn't the last time that this has occurred. So, what do you think as better, or what would you prefer? I can stick to classic DR, when I already have made a crop (or refrained from doing so), but that entails a long string of automatisms and page creations which could be seen as hassle; Pro: a tracking through the categories in Category: Brazilian FOP cases is available. On the other hand, I could also write you here, on the talk page, to discuss stuff (like FOP induced RevDels). No one should be compelled to use a DR when an uploader and a reviewer could cooperate in doing some clean up after a batch; Pro: less hassle, less pages created, Con: no category-based tracking. Both options are IMHO compatible with our rules. What do you say? Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grand-Duc Hi, thank you very much for your message and proposal. I also don't think there's a need for DRs about this stuff either, as I often crop the images myself when I notice there are issues with FOP. I would be very glad if you care to notify me here about any upload that needs to be fixed by a crop or other means (or even be deleted, if it's unfixable). Thanks again, Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for Your Contributions to Wiki Loves Folklore 2025!

Dear Contributor,

A heartfelt thank you for being part of Wiki Loves Folklore 2025! Your incredible contributions have helped document and preserve the world’s rich cultural heritage on Wikimedia Commons.

As a reminder, the contest ends tonight—so if you have any last-minute uploads, now’s the time!

📅 What’s next?

The jury process will begin on 15th April 2025 and is expected to be completed by July 2025. Please keep an eye on your Wikimedia talk page and ensure your email notifications are enabled so you don’t miss any updates about the results.

📝 We want to hear from you!

Your experience matters to us. We’ll be sending out a feedback form by mid-April to collect your thoughts, suggestions, and any challenges you faced during the contest. Your input will help us make the next edition even better!

Once again, thank you for being a part of this global celebration of folklore and traditions.

With appreciation,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

🌍 https://wikilovesfolklore.org/

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

Olá Darwin, como vai?

Não sei se pode me ajudar, mas estou desde ontem com esta dúvida que levantei no Ws en e no Commons: eu gostaria de adicionar aqui e no Source algumas obras do Governo Brasileiro que foram publicadas lá na década de 40 e 60 (como esse multilingue com discursos do Vargas), que, pelo que entendo, entraram em domínio público no Brasil segundo o Art. 662 do Código Civil de 1916 (com o Art. 46 valendo para a lei de 1973).

Acho que não existiriam dúvidas que estas obras estariam em domínio público no Brasil (apesar da Biblioteca da Presidência bancar a lei de 1998 pra banir certos usos de obras de décadas antes), mas eu gostaria de saber: também estariam liberadas nos EUA? Minha impressão é que elas se encaixariam bem dentro do PD-1996, com a versão em português do PD-Brasil-Gov podendo ser expandida para considerar as leis de 1916 e 1973 (a versão em inglês está bem completa). O que acha? Obrigado, Erick Soares3 (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Erick Soares3 Olá Erick, tudo que seja anterior a 1983 está coberto pela PD-Brasil-Gov e não é afectado em nada pela URAA, que só cobre o que não era domínio público nessa data, de modo que pode carregar à vontade. A lei actual não se aplica a esses conteúdos, que estão em domínio público há décadas, independentemente dessas alegações que falou. Darwin ^Ahoy! 00:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Entendido! Então vou começar amanhã, considerando que essa Biblioteca tem muito conteúdo relevante para o Commons (se essa história de bot pra mass upload não fosse tão complicada, até pediria um envio geral, como essa coleção também merece)! Eu também achei essa revista do governo brasileiro (mas publicada em inglês nos EUA) com muito conteúdo relevante e não encontrei nenhuma marca de copyright (ou evidência delas terem sido registradas posteriormente). Aqui seria aceitável como PD-US-non registered? O Google Books liberou o acesso/download de todas, de forma que imagino que não tenha proteção nos dois países (ao contrário desta bio do Machado de Assis, que não teve seu copyright renovado, mas só o HathiTrust libera a visualização). Obrigado outra vez! Erick Soares3 (talk) 00:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Erick Soares3 Eu tenho um botzinho em React (Catrapilha) que é o que estou usando para uppar a feed da Prefeitura de PoA, mas a minha impressão é que se estiver a fazer a curadoria junto com os carregamentos (o que é recomendável, para evitar problemas) o ganho não é tão grande assim, a menos que os metadados estejam bem organizados na fonte e sejam fáceis de traduzir para categorias do Commons. Em relação à revista, o que diz parece ser aplicável a essa situação, e penso que deve ser suficiente, mas caso tenha dúvidas pode sempre colocar o caso na esplanada de copyright. Darwin ^Ahoy! 00:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No caso da Biblioteca da Presidência, acho que deverá ser necessário fazer uma curadoria, enquanto a coleção do HathiTrust já está como PD-USGov. Eu cheguei a levantar essas questões na Esplanada, mas só tive resposta no Wikisource e agora com você - e também concordo que esse PD/sem registro é o bastante pra revista (também seria PD no Brasil, como obra do governo).

Essas leis de copyright acabam sendo bem chatas ou vagas. Até hoje não entendi bem o que "ato oficial" da lei de 98 (art. 8) abrange -- se é apenas leis, ou outras obras como o relatório do VLS-1 ou imagens publicadas por entidades do governo também entram nesse artigo (apesar de hoje em dia o governo usar um creative commons não comercial). Erick Soares3 (talk) 01:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Se tiver interesse de usar no bot, aqui tem várias imagens da Campanha da Legalidade que possuem relevância histórica (e sendo do governo do RS, também devem se aplicar no PD-Brasil Gov). Erick Soares3 (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flower horses during the Flower Festival, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.jpg

File:Flower horses during the Flower Festival, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 00:10, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image EXIF data

@Nakonana Yes, as it was published by the author in 500px with an open license (CC-BY-SA 3). It is very common that the EXIF information contradicts the license, usually because that's the default info the person has set in the camera, and they are not changing it for some specific file they release under a free license. There's not any reason to give any special value to it, as long as the file was freely relicensed by the same author. Darwin ^Ahoy! 18:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's good to know. Thanks. Nakonana (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nurbu Tamang Has Been Practising To Become A Fully Qualified Bompo For Last Years He Often Undertake (66088639).jpeg

File:Nurbu Tamang Has Been Practising To Become A Fully Qualified Bompo For Last Years He Often Undertake (66088639).jpeg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Omphalographer (talk) 00:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nurbu Tamang Has Been Practising To Become A Fully Qualified Bompo For Last Years He Often Undertake (66088639).jpeg

File:Nurbu Tamang Has Been Practising To Become A Fully Qualified Bompo For Last Years He Often Undertake (66088639).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Félix Nadar 1820-1910 portraits Jules Verne (restoration).jpg

This is listed as a w:en:Category:Wikipedia_former_featured_pictures former featured picture on enwiki, was this by chance collateral damage? JayCubby (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby Hello! I really can't explain that. It was deleted in August 2022 as part of an automated batch of uploads of a Brazilian vandal, who has no relation with this image. It's really a mystery. I'm very glad you noticed that, and I've restored the image. I checked the log of that batch, and there seem to be no other unrelated eliminations. Really weird. Darwin ^Ahoy! 18:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Regex error? Thanks for reverting the delinker. JayCubby (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby I've not reverted it, actually, as the damage was caused already 3 years ago... Could be regex, but not from me, AFAIK. Possibly some bug on the code of VisualChanger, the script I used for that. Darwin ^Ahoy! 19:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby Look at this. And nobody seem to have noticed it back then. Weird. Darwin ^Ahoy! 18:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marshalled_Storman

Category:Marshalled_Storman has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

GerritR (talk) 11:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]