Jump to content

User talk:Alachuckthebuck

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alachuckthebuck!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Check the license

[edit]

@Alachuckthebuck:Hi ,please check the license of this photo (File:The antiviral mechanism of LC-Plasma.jpg) AbchyZa22 (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 06:41, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
All the Best -- Chuck Talk 06:41, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck:Hi ,please check this (File:Logo Rapid Response 47 (USA).png) AbchyZa22 (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, the twitter account is not verified, and just links to the white house website, not it's own webpage. I have tagged for speedy deletion for this reason. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck:The twitter account says "affiliated a White House" in the check colour grises but the website of the White House says not copyrighted or says "CC-BY-3.0" (google translator). AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't verify that it is an official account of the US government. That's the main issue. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:40, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck:Ok te voy a decir en español, según la cuenta Rapid Response en X (antes Twitter) (en el título lado derecho aparece una cuenta verificada que algunos llaman "check blue" o "check grises",las cuentas verificadas color grises son los que pertenecen a las cuentas para los presidentes ,gobiernos,etc. pero en la cuenta Rapid Response aparece una cuenta verificada color grises con descripción "cuenta afiliada a White House") AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck:Hi please check (File:Innate Immune Responses to Influenza Virus Infections in the Upper Respiratory Tract.jpg) and (File:Localisation of PRRs responsible for influenza viral recognition.jpg) (google translator). AbchyZa22 (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing Flickr files

[edit]

Hey, messaging you since you're a license reviewer (and because I recognized you). I've had some problems with some files (File:Imelda Padilla, 2023 (cropped).jpg, File:Imelda Padilla, 2023 (alt crop).jpg, File:Mayor Bass with Representative Cárdenas announcing funds for new bus shelters, 2023.jpg, File:Alberto M. Carvalho, 2023 (cropped).jpg, and File:Mayor Bass meeting with LAUSD Superintendent Alberto M. Carvalho, 2023.jpg) as I placed {{PD-CAGov}} and a license review but the FlickreviewR 2 put a failed review on it. Some got deleted, but reinstated after I talked with the admins who deleted them, but I told them that I put the license review so that someone could add {{Flickr-unfree-but}} on it, and I wasn't sure if I could do so on my own. Was wondering if you could tell me what to do since you're a license reviewer. (also for File:George McKenna III, 2021 (cropped).jpg and File:George McKenna III speaking about the importance of COVID-19 vaccination, 2021.jpg, which haven't been reviewed yes). reppoptalk 03:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The reason the review failed is because PD-CAgov only applies to state government, not local/municipal governments (like the city of LA and the mayors office) I cannot pass these files as they do have copyright, and the template you linked doesn't apply in this case, as it's used when someone changes the license on flickr, and there's an archive link. I hope that clears things up. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 03:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the PD-CAGov template directly states that it includes city and municipal governments? ("government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies)") The template of Flickr-unfree-but is also not for using when someone changes the license, that's {{Change-of-license}}, it's used to note that the Flickr file can't use a specific copyright template but it's still free (like File:Prime Minister Keir Starmer Portrait (cropped).jpg, which is non-commercial and no-derivatives but is under {{OGL3}}). reppoptalk 21:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/12#Los_Angeles_government_Flickr_accounts. reppoptalk 21:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected on where the law applies. This issue should be raised with the city regarding their copyright claims (the only one that might have standing is photos with people from LAUSD. I'll check to make sure I'm using the correct template, and review the other files. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting with VFC

[edit]

Hi, Chuck. When 'Inserting "{{speedy|F10}}"' with VFC as in Special:Diff/1014070216 (or the more expected "{{SD|F10}}"), please ensure that you terminate that line by tapping "Enter", to ensure that the next line is a proper heading. You will probably be interested in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schelotto 4549.jpg, too. Thanks.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:20, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Note, I accidently put "{{sd|f10}}" , causing it to appear as a langcode, not speedy deletion! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:40, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

[edit]

Hi Chuck!

I have carefully reviewed the licensing terms applicable to the image hosted on Wikimedia Commons at this link File:April 2025 eruption.png. As stated on the source page https://en.vedur.is/about-imo/the-web/conditions, “Unless stated otherwise, you are free to use photographs and data on the IMO websites and data servers; however, if the data are used for presentation, publication, or other development, reference must be made to the Icelandic Meteorological Office and the date of data downloading.” Accordingly, I have ensured that all required attributions—including the reference to the Icelandic Meteorological Office and the precise date of data retrieval—are properly included in the work, thereby fully complying with the stipulated terms.

Best regards,

Gaggi96 Gaggi96 (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for leaving a message. When initially reviewing, I saw the copyright notice on the bottom, and didn't see mention of a commons compatible license. sorry for the mistake! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Since the image was deleted due to an incorrect decision, could you kindly restore it? Gaggi96 (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's been undeleted, sorry for the mistake! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]